List the assessment methods to be used and the context and resources required for assessment. Copy and paste the relevant sections from the evidence guide below and then re-write these in plain English.
Elements describe the essential outcomes. | Performance criteria describe the performance needed to demonstrate achievement of the element. |
1 | Monitor equipment operation | 1.1 | Monitor equipment operation according to instrument/electrical equipment operating principles and parameters |
| 1.2 | Access and interpret relevant technical drawings and schematics to determine system faults |
| 1.3 | Issue permit to work to allow work to be undertaken |
| 1.4 | Verify equipment operation/performance through test procedures to ensure correct operation and to confirm identified problems from other sources |
| 1.5 | Correct operational variations through calibration and adjustment |
| 1.6 | Document operational variations |
|
2 | Test/repair equipment | 2.1 | Verify equipment is operating correctly and document test results |
| 2.2 | Apply appropriate troubleshooting techniques to determine the cause of operational faults |
| 2.3 | Rectify operational faults through the application of relevant maintenance procedures |
| 2.4 | Isolate, remove and dispose of faulty equipment, and install new equipment |
| 2.5 | Verify the performance of newly installed equipment to ensure it meets required operational parameters and conditions |
| 2.6 | Record all repairs/installations to provide historical records of the condition of system equipment |
|
3 | Recommission systems and equipment | 3.1 | Recommission repaired/installed equipment to online operation in the correct sequence at the required operational parameters |
| 3.2 | Monitor or activate systems to ensure they are operating both safely and effectively |
| 3.3 | Close out permit to work and restore site/system to normal operation |
|
4 | Compile and analyse reports | 4.1 | Collect information concerning deviations/repaired equipment and put into accepted reporting format |
| 4.2 | Compile reports ensuring they provide an accurate and ongoing record of deviations in pipeline processes and a current record of pipeline and equipment trends |
| 4.3 | Utilise information or reports for short and long-term deviation control planning |
Evidence required to demonstrate competence in this unit must be relevant to and satisfy the requirements of the elements and performance criteria, and include the ability to:
test, repair, recommission and monitor the operational condition of instrument control systems
isolate and de-isolate equipment
read and interpret schematics, technical drawings and technical information
isolate the causes of problems and distinguish between causes of problems/alarm/fault indications, including:
instrument failure/malfunction
electrical failure/malfunction
mechanical failure/malfunction
equipment design deficiencies
product parameters (temperature, flows, pressure and levels)
process control system malfunction
power/utility failures
issue permits to allow work to be undertaken
verify equipment operation
prepare and analyse reports related to the equipment/ systems.
Evidence must be provided that demonstrates knowledge of:
process and plant schematic and instrumentation diagrams
types and functions of instrumentation and control devices
control functions, control regimes, adjustments and tuning
types and application of test and calibration methods
types and application of test equipment typically used with control system repair/maintenance/calibration
short and long-term deviation control planning
organisation procedures, including those covering
safety, emergency and hazard control
work permit systems
maintenance
standard operating procedures (SOPs)
hierarchy of control.
The unit should be assessed holistically and the judgement of competence based on a holistic assessment of the evidence.
The collection of performance evidence:
should occur over a range of situations which include typical disruptions to normal, smooth operations
will typically include a supervisor/third-party report focusing on consistent performance and problem recognition and solving. A supervisor/third-party report must be prepared by someone who has a direct, relevant, current relationship with the person being assessed and who is in a position to form a judgement on workplace performance relevant to the unit of competency
must include the testing and repair of at least three (3) items of equipment, use of appropriate tools, equipment and safety gear requiring demonstration of preparation, operation, completion and responding to problems
may use industry-based simulation for all or part of the unit particularly where safety, lack of opportunity or significant cost is an issue.
Assessment should occur in operational workplace situations. Where this is not possible, or where personal safety or environmental damage are limiting factors, assessment must occur in a sufficiently rigorous simulated environment reflecting realistic operational workplace conditions. This must cover all aspects of workplace performance, including environment, task skills, task management skills, contingency management skills and job role environment skills.
Assessment in a simulated environment should use evidence collected from one or more of:
walk-throughs
pilot plant operation
demonstration of skills
industry-based case studies/scenarios
‘what ifs’.
Knowledge evidence may be collected concurrently with performance evidence (provided a record is kept) or through an independent process, such as workbooks, written assessments or interviews (provided a record is kept).
Assessment processes and techniques must be appropriate to the language, literacy and numeracy requirements of the work being performed and the needs of the candidate.
Conditions for assessment must include access to all tools, equipment, materials and documentation required, including relevant workplace procedures, product and manufacturing specifications associated with this unit.
The regulatory framework will be reflected in workplace policies and procedures and is not required to be independently assessed.
Foundation skills are integral to competent performance of the unit and should not be assessed separately.
Assessors must satisfy the assessor competency requirements that are in place at the time of the assessment as set by the VET regulator.
In addition, the assessor or anyone acting in subject matter expert role in assessment must demonstrate both technical competency and currency. If the assessor cannot demonstrate technical competency and currency they must assess with a subject matter expert who does meet these requirements.
Technical competence can be demonstrated through one or more of:
relevant VET or other qualification/Statement of Attainment
appropriate workplace experience undertaking the type of work being assessed under routine and non-routine conditions
appropriate workplace experience supervising/evaluating the type of work being assessed under routine and non-routine conditions
Currency can be demonstrated through one or more of:
being currently employed undertaking the type of work being assessed
being employed by the organisation undertaking the type of work being assessed and having maintained currency in accordance with that organisation’s policies and procedures
having consulted/had contact with an organisation undertaking the type of work being assessed within the last twelve months, the consultation/contact being related to assessment
conducting on-the-job training/assessments of the type of work being assessed
being an active member of a relevant professional body and participating in activities relevant to the assessment of this type of work.